The built environment is at an inflection point; these are tough times. Barely any major projects are breaking ground. Viability is a constant discussion and a cloud that sits above everything. And yet the systemic pressures: climate emergency, resource depletion, biodiversity crisis, decreasing social equity, have not paused to wait for the market to respond. If anything, they have intensified, and we are feeling it in drought, heatwaves, wildfires…

So, what does leadership look like in a sector that is, by its own admission, a laggard in innovation and doing things differently? And how do we choose reinvention over repetition?

Don’t we all want the same thing: better design, better projects, less waste? But… is it the system that is constraining us when sustainable buildings are still secondary to time and cost?

The Human Question

There is a phrase that surfaces in conversations with built environment leaders: once you see it, you can’t unsee it. Once you genuinely understand, (and are deeply moved) by the scale of what is needed; not just technically, but morally, there should be no comfortable return to business as usual, when we are talking about an existential threat to humankind.

Leadership in this space is not primarily a technical skills. It is a collective action, not just the responsibility of senior leaders, but of all of us with the agency and influence to act. It is a willingness to pause and engage. In an industry where project pressure compresses every decision into the shortest possible cycle, carving out time and space to think differently is itself a radical act. It requires the kind of human-to-human engagement that no linear tender process or delivery programme makes room for.

What does it mean to genuinely care as a business leader? It means holding the moral case and the business case in the same hand and navigating both together; they are not in opposition.

The UKGBC Recalibrate Executive Leadership programme has found repeatedly that senior leaders care; they care deeply. Their barriers are navigating change within the current system, but it is clear collaboration at sector level is an essential solution.

From looking at why not, to looking at how, and why we must

Systems Change thinking sounds abstract until you apply it live. Following five rounds or Recalibrate, leaders came out of the programme saying ‘we need to shift together’, and look at the full value chain. The UKGBC facilitated the collaborative, systems-based examination of two live, major commercial and residential projects. The outcome was the development of a regenerative vision and solutions for overcoming real issues such as viability by looking at the problem holistically and in a different way. Standing back and asking different questions can have more value than we think.

We have seen what happens when a team pauses to look holistically at a project – not just at cost and programme, but at how every decision connects to resource use, supply chain, long-term performance, and community outcomes. Making decisions differently is not utopian, but practical. Communities become part of the process. Waste gets interrogated. Utilities like energy and water become precious. Nature is given space. Over-specification, still one of the most persistent and least-discussed inefficiencies in our industry, gets called out.

 

This kind of thinking cannot stay at project level. It needs to move through the sector: into conversations about what gets financed and on what terms, into how we configure supply chains, and into how we define partnerships that are built around shared outcomes and long-term value rather than risk transfer.

As part of the UKGBC Systems Change programme, we recently held a fabulous ‘re-imagining finance’ event to literally re-imagine how sustainable finance could unlock a more sustainable built environment. This event was hosted by Hawkins\Brown and run by UKGBC and the University of Southampton and kicked off the UKGBC Finance, Value and Risk workstream.

This is not about making sustainability palatable by dressing it in financial language. It is about recognising that the two were never as separate as we made them.

Viability is not the enemy of ambition

The current pressure on viability does not have to be a reason to lower ambition. Hawkins\Brown’s Build Lean campaign recognises it can be a forcing function to the rigour that good, sustainable design has always demanded: optimised, sufficient, deliberately free of waste. Buildings fit for today and tomorrow should focus on honesty and transparency that is part of the ongoing design conversation from inception and beyond completion. They are delivered by trams that value periods for reflection more than the certainty of a linear programme. They share their lessons and demonstrate measured outcomes that meet the needs of people and the planet. They are frameworks that provide just enough; sourced from thoroughly evidenced supply chains, that embody care for their contexts, owners and occupiers. They are maintained and adapted as technology, social structures, and out climate change.

The work ahead

We are not arguing for home as a passive state. The urgency is real and scary, and softening it with comfortable framing does nobody any favours. But the sector has the tools and knowledge to succeed. We need to use our agency and influence at project, organisational and systems level to make change happen. What it needs is leadership willing to sit with the discomfort and act anyway.

Once you see it, you really can’t unsee it.

Louisa Bowles is Partner and Head of Sustainability at Hawkins\Brown. Elfrida Hamilton-Russell is Chief Impact Officer at UKGBC, where she leads the Leadership programme.

Related